#Adobe creative cloud video proxy software#
Any other company engaged in this practice would have their software labeled as “bloatware,” but it seems users are content with spending thousands on upgrading their hardware to work with the software rather than the other way around. Since locking users into its Creative Cloud, it seems that Adobe is less concerned with making its software run well and more concerned with what features it can use for marketing purposes to suck more customers in.
#Adobe creative cloud video proxy pro#
And really, if Apple can keep Final Cut Pro X humming (even on 360 video) on a 6-year-old Macbook Air like mine, there’s no reason Adobe can’t find a way, though it doesn’t seem to be able to do so even with key software such as Lightroom either.Īdobe seems to recognize this, releasing “lighter” software such as Adobe Premiere Rush CC, but all this does is further fragment the video editing landscape even within Adobe’s own tent. I used to run Adobe Premiere Pro CS3 on an Acer Ferrari One netbook. Except that it has for a decade, and the creep upwards has only been in the last few years. This is where the commenters chime in and tell me that if I’m serious about editing video, I shouldn’t use a Macbook Air or that video editing doesn’t come cheap.
If you take a look at the minimum system requirements for the latest version of Adobe Premiere Pro, you’ll see that it even outpaces a brand-new Macbook Air in some areas. I can’t say the same for Adobe Premiere Pro, and this is what’s baffling. And several years later, on the same Macbook Air I installed it on seven years ago (and paid for once, without a subscription), it still works just as well and mostly as fast. Final Cut Pro X was derided for its interface change, but in reality, it dumped old conventions for a sleek and modernized interface that just worked. Since non-linear editing software became easier to use and more cheaply available, video editing became a tool for the masses, not unlike pen and paper. One of the great changes I’ve seen since I was professionally shooting video for newspapers is the democratization of the tools.
While through the universities I’ve worked at, I’ve been able to run all of this software on the latest and greatest machines, my home setups more mirror what mere mortals can afford: a humble Macbook Air and a mid-range PC and iMac. I’ve used everything from Final Cut Pro 7, to Final Cut Pro X, to several iterations of Adobe Premiere Pro. But these features have come at a cost of ever-increasing system requirements, begging the question: Is it worth it?Īs some background, I’ve been teaching college students to edit video for the better part of a decade. Since moving to the Creative Cloud software-as-a-service model, Adobe has been providing several feature updates per year to its software.
0 kommentar(er)
